"The Refugee Crisis - And Our Responsibility"
Sydney M. Williams
Thought of the Day
“The Refugee Crisis – And Our Responsibility”
September 10, 2015
That
there is a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions in refugees fleeing Syria,
Iraq, Afghanistan and numerous African nations for Europe cannot be denied.
That the causes of these flights are an insurgent, ISIS-run Islamic Caliphate
that now controls territory In Syria and Iraq larger than Great Britain, ruthless
dictators like Bashar al Assad in Syria and Omar Hassan al-Bashir in Sudan, and
Islamic terrorism throughout the region is also undeniable. And we know that Islamic
terrorist organizations will not let this crisis go to waste. They will insert
terrorists and martyrs among the fleeing refugees, thereby increasing risks to
the West.
The
UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) have said there were 14.4
million refugees worldwide at the end of 2014, a 25% increase from 2013. Almost
all have come from the Middle East and Africa ,
chased out by fear, famine and pestilence. Additionally, the number of
internally displaced persons is put at 38.2 million. The situation has worsened
in 2015.
The
photograph of the body of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi washed up on a Turkish
beach near the town of Bodrum
this past week tore at the heart strings of those in the West. It brought a personal
element to one of the greatest human tragedies in recent times. This boy, with
his Velcro sneakers and red shirt, could have been our son or grandson. In fact
he was Syrian, trying to reach Europe when the
boat he was on capsized, drowning him, his five-year-old brother and his
mother. His father, Abdullah, alone of the family survived. But will that
knowledge effect they way we treat the causes of this migration from Hell? Will
we finally admit that those being tortured, killed and chased from their homes
are not a consequence of “violent extremism,” but are victims of Islamic
terrorism? Will we reconsider the role we have played in abetting this horror?
In
the past five years, four million Syrians have fled Bashar al Assad’s regime.
Another seven million are living in the country, but displaced from their
homes. Two hundred and ten thousand have been killed in the five years since
the “Arab Spring.” This is the country where President Obama drew a “red line”
in the sand two years ago, and then walked away when it was crossed. Will
Aylan’s death change the way we perceive our responsibilities to the world and
will it alter the hypocrisy of the West’s tolerance of the intolerant?
The
truth is that we bear much of the blame for the unwinding we are seeing in the Middle East . We abdicated our responsibility. After
invading Iraq in 2003 – an action supported by both Houses of Congress and the
UN, but one that can be debated today – we ignominiously left prematurely in
2011, letting the country fall into anarchy. We supported the Arab Spring in Egypt ,
which caused President Hosni Mubarak to resign. Now, four years later tens of thousands
of Egyptians are dead. A February interview by NPR suggested that President
Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is worse than Mubarak. While “leading from behind” and
without Congressional or UN support, we deposed Libya ’s leader, Muammar Gadaffi,
with no plans for a replacement. We refused to uphold a “red line” we had drawn
in Syria .
The Taliban has not gone quietly into the night, as forecast. The Council on
Foreign Relations recently noted: “The Taliban has outlasted the world’s most
potent military forces and its two main forces now challenge governments in Afghanistan and Pakistan .” And, in appeasing
Muslims, we have left Israel
isolated.
Why
has the West allowed this to happen? There is a belief among the West’s elites
that we are not our “brother’s keepers.” There is a perception that we must
exorcise the sin of colonialism. The map of the Middle East was drawn by
Western nations in the aftermath of World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire . It was done with no regard to the tribes who
had lived there for millenniums and without concern (or even knowledge) about
the differences between Shiites and Sunnis. There is no question of the West’s
culpability. But, we cannot sit back and atone for all the wrongs done. We
cannot let the process unfold in a way that thousands more will die and
millions more will be displaced. We must try to protect the innocent by
adhering to universal moral laws that says it is wrong to torture, kill, rape
and plunder. If we simply walk away, saying it is not our affair, the crisis
will worsen. More blood will be spilt and Europe ,
already swamped assimilating existing Muslims, will become more troubled.
Like
Parkinson’s Law, the void we leave when we abdicate responsibility gets filled.
The Russians will increase their presence, or the Chinese will jump in. Will
the Middle East be a safer place with Vladimir
Putin swinging the night stick? Will peace-loving Muslims, Israelis and what
few Christians are left in the region be better served with a beat walked by Xi
Jinping? The United States abrogated its
responsibilities as the world’s policeman. And, sadly, it has led to the exodus
of millions of refugees.
“Western
elites,” as Victor Davis Hanson wrote recently, “deny their own
exceptionalism.” Our exceptionalism is not a function of race or religion, or
brains and brawn; it is a consequence of ideas. It is the belief in consensual
government, the rule of law, equality, religious freedom, free markets,
individual liberty and success based on merit. These are beliefs unique to the
West. But they incorporate rights that are God given and are therefore
universal. Defending them is an obligation of those who have them. If we don’t,
we risk losing what freedoms we have.
With
all of our failings, there has never been a country like the United States .
We are not without faults. We read about them every day. But we are the only
nation that has both the goodness of heart, the financial resources, the force
of character and the military strength to maintain world peace. We cannot do it
alone, but we must assume leadership. We must publically talk of values that
are universal, that are not exclusive to any specific religion or race. Our
error has been that, in our desire to be seen as fair in the interest of being
pluralistic, we accepted moral relativism – a belief that there are no absolute
values. That is short-sighted and wrong.
To
solve the refugee crisis that is flooding Europe means we must increase the
number of vetted refugees we will accept, but we must also strike at its root causes
– the principal one being ISIS and Islamic terrorism. We cannot wish it away.
It will not disappear on its own. It is late and the monster has strengthened;
we must confront it in its lair. The peace of the world depends on it.
Labels: Miscellaneous
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home