"Priorities"
Sydney M. Williams
Thought of the Day
“Priorities”
August 14, 2014
A
sensitively written op-ed by Nicholas Kristoff, in Sunday’s New York Times,
had the title: Is a hard life inherited? Mr. Kristoff relates the story of a
childhood friend who has had a hard life. His mother died after choking on a
bit of bacon. His father left home. This all happened when he was five. With
his three siblings, he was raised by a grandmother, growing up in a “ramshackle
home in a mire of disadvantage.” Despite having a “first-class” mind, he was
suspended for truancy in the 8th grade, drifted through life in a
haze of alcohol and drugs, while fathering two illegitimate children.
Mr.
Kristoff’s point is that events beyond his friend’s control determined the man
he became, and that there are steps society can take to help prevent such
personal tragedies. He writes that a good teacher or mentor would have made a
difference. Mr. Kristoff rues the loss of union jobs that might have created
incentives for prudent behavior. He cites a higher minimum wage and a better
education as steps that could be taken, but the starting point, he claims, must
be empathy.
Empathy
is indeed an endearing quality, but I suspect the problem has as much to do
with shifting attitudes of behavior. As a society, we have embraced moral
relativism. We have become more permissive. We have become hedonistic. Despite
the proliferation of birth control and the general acceptance of abortion, the
number of children born out of wedlock has soared. In 1965, less than 10% of
all births were to women out of wedlock. Today it is 41%, and the numbers
continue to rise. In 1965, the percentage of White children and Black children
born to unmarried women were, respectively, 3.1% and 24%. Today, those numbers
are 18% and 72%. “Shotgun” weddings have gone the way of the Dodo Bird.
Granted, about 58% of single-mother births are to cohabitating couples, many of
whom will marry. Nevertheless, a moral sense has been lost.
While
Mr. Kristoff’s childhood friend may have suffered from problems impossible to
readily treat, the issue Mr. Kristoff raises is one of priorities. He suggests
empathy as the first line of defense, an important component, but not
sufficient, in my opinion, to address the problem. Keep in mind, changes in the
way we live have caused us to become disconnected from our community, as Robert
Putnam detailed in his book, Bowling Alone. Suburbs are less personal in
nature than villages. More women work than ever before – and both men and women
work longer hours – leaving less time to volunteer. In cities, fund raising
extravaganzas have replaced the more democratic concept of volunteering one’s
time. In national political campaigns, raising money via
$30,000-a-plate-dinners – afforded only by the few – has replaced grassroots
efforts of door-to-door solicitations. We give of our money, but not of our
time. The contagion of computers and hand-held devices has distracted us from
the time necessary to participate in our children’s schools. We have become
more self-absorbed. We have turned over most of the care for the indigent to
public officials, blindfolding the rest of us to our communities’ needs.
With
an understanding that “Big Brother” will be there when we need him, we have
forsaken personal responsibility. Immediate gratification has replaced looking
to the horizon. We protest for the right of women to receive free birth
control, but ignore the fact that single-motherhood (which has increased,
despite a proliferation of myriad birth control methods) too often leads to
poverty, drug use and crime. We march for gay rights, yet statistics tell us
the surest way to reduce a child’s chance of living in poverty is to have her,
or him, raised in a traditional family.
None
of this is meant to condemn women’s rights or gay rights. I am neither sexist
nor homophobic. People should be free to live the lifestyles they choose. But,
in regard to children, we need a renewed emphasis on the importance of family.
We need opinion leaders (especially those idolized by the young) to speak to
the value of two-parent households – a father and a mother. Forty-five percent
of all children living with single mothers live in poverty, versus 13% of
children living with both parents. Using statistics from the U.S. Census, the
Heritage Foundation determined that being raised in a family with a father and
mother reduces a child’s chances of living in poverty by 82%. Marriage is the
best antidote to poverty. It should be celebrated, not trivialized or demeaned.
We
will never to be able to solve every problem, help every addict, or fix every
broken home. It may not have been possible to help Mr. Kristoff’s friend without
very expensive professional assistance. But we should provide all people the
tools to make their lives better, and I don’t mean increasing transfer payments
or expressing empathy. I mean teaching children values in schools that can be
brought home. Show them by example. It is only right that President Obama and
Mayor De Blasio address NOW (National Organization for Women) and LGBTA
(Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgender Alliance). But, as they do, they should
also note that they have entered into traditional marriages, because of love
for their spouse and for the sake of their children.
Young
people from time immemorial have looked for heroes, to those whose lives they
would like to emulate. In years gone by, we looked to professionals in our
communities, lawyers and doctors, athletes and firemen, druggists and
merchants, teachers and policemen. Today’s youth is more likely to look at the
entertainment field, including the culturally void like gangsta rap. They watch
their sports heroes, many of whom set good examples, but some that do not. Shocking
audiences has always been a way of getting attention when one is on stage or
the field, but that’s where it should remain. Instead, the behavior of many
entertainers has become more abhorrent off-stage than on – and promoted
extensively by the media. Young people are vulnerable and easily influenced,
not realizing, or ignoring, the fact that money protects their idols. In
attempting to imitate lives they can never lead, they too often destroy their
own.
Millions
of people, like Mr. Kristoff’s friend, are in need. A few may just be “bad
seeds,” beyond redemption. But most can be helped. Schools that emphasize
values, as well as skills, are critical. A return to some form of national
service – whether military or civilian – would add purpose to a young person’s
life. Encouraging personal involvement in one’s community would help. Empathy
is important. But our biggest priority should be to emphasize the importance of
marriage, its focus on the future, the commitment it takes and the stability it
provides our children. People point out that a good marriage requires luck. It
does, but it also demands hard work and selflessness.
Labels: TOTD
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home