"Obama's Christmas Gift to Castro"
Sydney M. Williams
Thought of the Day
“Obama’s Christmas
Gift to Castro”
December 22, 2014
“The
Obama administration is ushering in a transformational era for millions of
Cubans who had suffered as a result of more than fifty years of hostility
between the two nations;” so opined the New York Times last Thursday in
applauding Mr. Obama’s “historic move on Cuba.” Certainly, talking is better
than not, and the benefits of trade tend to be mutual, but I had no idea that
the people of the United
States were responsible for the repressive
conditions under which most Cubans live. I, obviously naively, had always
thought that the absence of the rule of law, the suppression of free speech,
the poverty, the jailing of dissidents had something to with the communist
government the Castro brothers had imposed on their Country fifty years ago. The
opinion leaders of the Times apparently believe differently. We Americans,
according to them, share in the blame.
Mr.
Obama emphasized that point when he mistakenly inferred that the United States had been a colonizer of Cuba , rather
than its liberator in the Spanish-American War. He spoke on Thursday, with
words directed at the Cuban people: “Others have seen us as a former colonizer,
intent on controlling your future. Let us leave behind the legacy of both
colonization and communism.” While it is true that the Cuban Constitution,
until the early 1930s, included an “intervention” clause,” Cuba was never colonized by the United States .
It was true, though, that American companies like United Fruit operated in Cuba , with advantages accruing to shareholders
at the expense of Cuban employees, and the Mafia, an American institution, made
Havana an open
city in the post-World War II era. So, why does Mr. Obama twist and exaggerate
history for his own purposes? Why does mainstream media not call him out?
Headlines
in the media and comments from some in the columnists have said that our
isolating of Cuba
has not worked. It is time, they said, to try something new. I agree, it is
time to try something new. Communism has not worked. Will opening the doors to
American tourists and American businessmen and women rid the country of its
legacy of dictatorial suppression? I don’t know. It seems doubtful. But I
agree, why not try? Will business or individuals invest? I suspect not, or at
least not in any meaningful way, absent the rule of law. Why not try democracy
and give all Cubans the right to own property and permit them to speak freely?
Why not let the people freely elect their leaders? If Raúl Castro is to be
believed change may be slow in coming. On Saturday, he gave a wide-ranging
speech. “We won the war,” he declared. David defeated Goliath is the way he put
it. He said the changes need to be gradual to create a system of “prosperous
and sustainable communism.”
At
Friday’s news conference, Mr. Obama said, “I want to work with this new
Congress to get things done.” Yet, the President missed an opportunity to both
work with Congress and improve his chances of permanently changing America ’s policies toward Cuba . Why did
he not seek to co-opt the three U.S.
Senators of Cuban heritage, Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Ted
Cruz (R-TX)? Why did he not consult the four Representatives of Cuban heritage
in the House – two Democrats and two Republicans? I suspect the answer is that
his ego would not let him share the stage. Yet, if he had, he might very well
of helped restore civility and bi-partisanship to Washington ,
and he would have ensured the smooth passage of any new legislation regarding Cuba . Most
former Presidents would have done so.
Instead,
it was Pope Francis who played a key role, perhaps hoping to reprise the part
played by Pope John Paul II in helping to bring down the Iron Curtain. Cuba , once a Catholic nation, has been on the Vatican ’s radar
since Fidel Castro took over. Their five-decade failure to exorcise the atheism
of Cuban leaders has never diminished their desire to do so. Pope Francis, by
all accounts, is a good and kindly man, but I find it troubling that the
spiritual leader of Roman Catholics recently chose not to meet the Tibetan
spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. Unlike Mr. Obama who did meet with the Dalai
Lama at the White House, Pope Francis seemed to be concerned he would offend China ’s
communist leaders.
In
this season of Christmas, it is worth considering a recent study by Cornell University , which compared happiness
derived from gifts of a material nature to those they called experiential – the
gift of an experience – a dinner out, theater tickets or a trip. They found the
latter provided greater happiness. Perhaps that is what Mr. Obama had in mind
during this Pentecostal season. The Castro’s, since seizing control in 1959, have
argued that the poverty their people endure is due to the monster that is the United States .
Raúl Castro accepted Mr. Obama’s gift and declared victory. There is, however,
a catch. If life for Cubans does not improve, it will be harder to blame the Goliath
to their north. If life does improve, will they credit their northern neighbor?
I suspect we know the answer.
……………………………………………………………………………..
I
do hope your Holidays will be enjoyable, that you will be able to spend time
with family and friends, and I wish you the very best for a happy, healthy and
prosperous New Year!
Labels: TOTD
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home