"What Progressives Got Wrong"
Sydney M. Williams
Thought of the Day
“What Progressives Got Wrong”
November 14, 2016
“Trump’s Victory Challenges the Global
Liberal Order”
Headline,
“Financial Times”
November
10, 2016
Methinks the FT got it backward. The headline should have read:
“Trump’s Victory May Restore the
Global Liberal Order.” Because the “global liberal order” has eroded. Slowly, insidiously
but certainly, individual liberties have diminished, as the state has assumed
increasing responsibilities and as more people have become dependent on it. The
inference is that the FT would have been pleased to have seen a continuation of
the Obama policies of greater government involvement in the economy, and a
concomitant decline in freedom – usurped by regulatory agencies, Executive
Orders and political correctness. The headline reflects the failure of elites
to understand why they lost. This decline in liberty is sad, for it was in
Britain that modern liberalism first appeared – Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Adam
Smith and John Stuart Mill – all men from whose message we have strayed.
While classical liberalism is fundamental to our success as a nation, economies
have undergone a seismic shift. Technology, communication and globalization
have fundamentally changed the way goods and services are produced, delivered
and consumed. For a large number of Americans, certainty has been replaced with
uncertainty, optimism by pessimism, hope by fear. Joseph Schumpeter’s “creative
destruction” has done enough damage to the economy without making it worse with
putative regulations. While progressives
concern themselves with issues like protecting students from uncomfortable
speech, transgender bathrooms and an elusive and amorphous desire for equality,
millions of Americans are focused on surviving. It is not only roofs to protect
them and food to sustain them that are needed, it is the sense of dignity and
self-sufficiency that comes from work. It is not that the foci of progressives
are unimportant, but that their priorities pale in comparison to the more
fundamental need of people – jobs.
How ironic it was, after the election, that schools across the country
felt a need to comfort children supposedly traumatized by the election of
Donald Trump! How unsurprising it was that political correctness reared its
hypocritical head on the nation’s campuses. On Wednesday morning, for example,
the director of the Intercultural Engagement Center at Virginia Tech e-mailed
the following: “Good morning students,
colleagues, friends. Many in our community, and many among us, are waking up
with fear, anxiety, concern, questions, and confusion among other emotions.”
The University of Michigan provided Play-Doh and crayons to students too upset
to attend class. Yale made exams and class attendance optional. Cornell offered
a campus-wide “cry-in.” We are raising a generation of spoiled brats. One
hundred and thirty-two million Americans voted in a democratically-held
election. Are we incapable of accepting the results? Schools and colleges could
(and should) have used the opportunity to celebrate the fact that the American
people voted, not as they were told to by the media or governmental elites, not
as pollsters suggested, and not as teachers and administrators preferred, but
as they saw fit. Even the columnist David Brooks, normally a voice of reason,
referred to this “horrific election
result.” Trump has faults, but he is not Beelzebub. The words and the
actions of these whiners show contempt for the American voter.
Despite unemployment declining by half over the past eight years,
workforce participation has reached forty-year lows. There is no question as to
the value and necessity of welfare, which the federal government amply provides,
but regulations and tax policies have stymied job creation. Progressives prefer
coddling to discipline, moral relativism to proven, age-old values. They
believe the state, in the form of Washington bureaucrats, know better than the
individual, family members and those in communities and neighborhoods. They
have ignored the importance of self-respect and dignity that comes through
work. A decline in the cohesiveness of communities, deteriorating family
formations, and an increase in drug and alcohol abuse are, in part, a result of
a lack of work. Dignity’s nemesis is idleness, an unintended (and unrecognized)
consequence of social welfare. And idleness leads to a lack of self-respect. I
don’t pretend to know the right balance, only that the current system is
working in ways opposite to what was intended. Keep in mind, the only
demographic in the U.S. where mortality rates have increased is in middle-aged,
white people. Suicide, drug overdoses and Cirrhosis are the principal causes. A
lack of purpose in life is a primary cause. Over the past fifty years,
according to Nicholas Eberstadt, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
and author of Men Without Work, the
percentage of working-aged men outside the workforce has increased from 10% to
22%, with millions more underemployed.
Progressives condemn Trump’s vulgarity, but surround themselves with
entertainers like Beyonce, J-Zee, Miley Cyrus and the Kardashians, hoping to
appeal to their millions of Twitter followers, but ignoring the fact these media
Stars live lives alien to the average person – in gated communities, immune
from scary inner-city streets, failing schools and apart from the despair of
poverty-stricken rural America. While Trump’s words about women and minorities
were widely, and rightly, condemned, there was little criticism about the crude
words and phrases embedded in the lyrics of those who get a pass because of
their progressive leanings. I hope the election was a condemnation of this culture,
and that it foretold a restoration of respect for businesses like Hobby Lobby
and institutions like the Little Sisters of the Poor, and for the work done by
Charter Schools to provide choice to inner-city minority students. I would like
to think it will encourage those like Amy Schumer, Whoopi Goldberg and Jon
Stewart to fulfil their promises to emigrate.
Corruption and self-dealing, as was made clear in the exposure of the
Clinton Foundation, underlie sanctimonious Washington elites. The Augean Stables, if not cleansed, will become filthier – a swamp that needs “draining,”
is the way Donald Trump put it. It was not investigative reporters from traditional
news sources that uncovered this hotbed of cronyism; it was WikiLeaks. This
election showed the power and ubiquity of the internet. We will not return to a
time when all Americans tuned in to a Walter Cronkite. We will never again get
our news from only three television sources. The New York Times, The Los
Angeles Times, The Washington Post have
lost one third of their subscribers over the past two decades. The Huffington
Post and Breitbart, individually, have more readers than those three newspapers
combined.
People must believe they have a chance, in a future that appears bleak.
They must feel they can flourish in a world they cannot grasp. Progressives let
them down. Post-election reports in mainstream newspapers and magazines like The Economist suggest they still don’t
understand what happened. Mea culpas and soul searching are not part of their
curricula vitae. Instead, they continue a Walter Mitty-like existence – day
dreaming, while listening only to themselves, believing what they want to
believe.
For President Trump to prevail, he must be optimistic; he must give
people hope. He must be principled, but willing to compromise; respectful of
his opponents, but steadfast in his ideas; tough with enemies and steady with
allies. His job will not be easy, but he can succeed. Let us hope he does.
Labels: politics, the election, Thought of the Day, Trump
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home