Monday, June 19, 2017

"The Dystopian World of James Comey"

Sydney M. Williams
swtotd.blogspot.com

Thought of the Day
“The Dystopian World of James Comey”
June 19, 2017

I am one of the few honest people I have ever known.”
                                                                                                          Nick Carroway, narrator
                                                                                                          The Great Gatsby
                                                                                                          F. Scott Fitzgerald

Substitute Comey for Carroway and you have a sense of the arrogance and hypocrisy embedded in the former’s testimony. James Comey is expert at navigating the obstacles that constitute Washington’s politics. The former FBI Director came across as more of a prosecutor than an investigator and public servant. Having used bait-and-switch tactics over the past year, Mr. Comey gladdened, infuriated and appeased Democrats, while he irritated, enthused and angered Republicans. Like his predecessor, J. Edgar Hoover, he thought himself invincible.

His testimony was Orwellian. Words meant what he wanted them to mean. To “leak” a memo about a private meeting with the President, via a third party, to The New York Times was okay. Yet, it was not alright to tell the press that the President was not under investigation regarding Russian interference in the election, even though he wasn’t. It was his duty, he alleged last July, to lay out the prosecutorial case against Hillary Clinton for using a private e-mail server while Secretary of State, but he felt it his responsibility to determine that no reasonable jury would convict her. Nevertheless, he felt bound, in October, to say she was still under investigation. He said he had no doubt that Russia interfered in the election, yet offered no evidence.

Mr. Comey told Senators that Mr. Trump lied as to why he (Mr. Comey) was fired, but was less direct with the President. He construed the word “hope,” as uttered by Mr. Trump regarding Michael Flynn, as implying obstruction, knowing full well it would mean his good friend, special counsel Robert Mueller, would have to investigate the allegation. (If “hope” becomes standard for obstruction of justice charges, all of Washington will be under indictment, as will most Americans.) James Comey testified that he agreed to accept (then) Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s request that the investigation into Mrs. Clinton be referred to as a “matter,” last July, knowing that to do so was wrong. Yet he did not feel obliged to disagree. His performance throughout his testimony suggested he was being either devious or he was a poltroon… or perhaps both. If he truly felt wronged, a courageous, honorable man would have resigned.

Mr. Comey has abused his position as Director of the FBI, certainly since last July. But, while he may have the ethics of a warthog, he is not stupid. For the last nine months, like Uriah Heep, the unctuous Mr. Comey bobbed and weaved around the Scylla of Washington politics and the Charybdis of ethical behavior – that is until he encountered Mr. Trump, an outsider to Washington politics, a man who had promised to “drain the swamp,” a place where he (Mr. Comey) was one of its most prominent denizens. Whether you hate him or love him, all agree that Mr. Trump is no master of subtlety. The President fired Mr. Comey unceremoniously, something unexpected by a man who felt untouchable. As one who tried to please everyone, Mr. Comey would have been well served to have re-read the story in Aesop’s Fables of “The man, the boy and the donkey” – the moral of which is, you can’t please everyone.

Once fired by Mr. Trump, Democrats forgave Mr. Comey his transgressions regarding Hillary Clinton and Loretta Lynch. Since his firing, Mr. Comey has cast his lot with those who see Mr. Trump as an illegitimate President, an autocrat, they claim, with a far-right agenda – a President who should be hastened from office, regardless of the cost to our democracy. In testimony, Mr. Comey offered the excuse that the leaking of his memo was for self-protection against a President he did not trust. He said it was justified if the consequence was the hiring of a special counsel. Since Mr. Comey was unable to bring the President down on charges of colluding with the Russians over last November’s election, he now hopes his friend Mr. Mueller will find obstruction of justice as cause for impeachment.

The failure of Democrats to accept last November’s election results reinforced the vitriol that consumes our country. It worsened the culture of incivility and violence. It is manifested in many ways: in the use of crude (and cruel) language by late night comedians and talk-show hosts, like Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon; in Madonna calling for the White House to be bombed, and in a mask of Mr. Trump’s bloodied, severed head held up by Kathy Griffin; it is visible in a publically-funded Shakespearean play in New York’s Central Park that showed the stabbing of a blond, blue-suited Trump-lookalike as Julius Caesar. And, five days ago, we saw it in the shooting of four Republicans on a ball field in Alexandria, Virginia. While no one political party has an exclusive in terms of foul language and heinous acts, we cannot ignore the role played by social media, i.e. the posting by James Hodgkinson, the shooter of Republican House Whip Steve Scalise, to his Facebook page in March: “Trump is a traitor. Trump has destroyed our democracy. It’s time to destroy Trump & Co.”

But icons from Hollywood, the media and Washington take no responsibility for the culture of hatred they have helped inspire. Instead, when a CNN host calls the President a piece of s**t, they cite First Amendment rights; or, in the instance of Congressman Scalise, they employ the Trojan horse of gun control, as did Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe within moments of the shooting in Arlington.

Politics has long been a blood sport, but incivility has reached heights last seen in the Vietnam era. Science fiction writer, Robert Heinlein, once wrote that dying cultures invariably exhibit “personal rudeness, bad manners and a lack of consideration for others in minor matters.” That is a current cultural trend that no one can deny. Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, said civilizations die from suicide, not murder. Social media has become a medium for the venting of passionate hatred. I post photographs of my grandchildren and wildlife, and an occasional non-political essay. But what we see are venomous outpourings of those who see this venue as a forum for political hyperbole. Like Joseph Welch, chief counsel for the United States Army when it was under investigation by Senator Joseph McCarthy, we ask those who post such partisan comments on social media, “At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”

As a friend in Europe recently wrote, the attempt to find a Russian connection to Mr. Trump’s campaign of last year has created an Austin Powers-like atmosphere of looking for a crime to fit a predetermined judgement. In his self-serving testimony before the Senate, Mr. Comey did nothing to reduce the hate-filled tenor that permeates Washington and our nation. Could he have helped? He is a smart man, a man who has been around corridors of power for a long time. Honesty, fairness and straight-forward answers would have brought some succor to a divided country. However, it was his reputation he was interested in saving, not bandaging wounds or revealing truth. He knew what he was doing. He chose the dystopian way.






Labels: , , , ,

Monday, December 19, 2016

"Fake News"

Sydney M. Williams

Thought of the Day
“Fake News”
December 19, 2016

“Fake News”

“Ninety-nine percent of failures come from people who have the habit of making excuses.”
                                                                                                George Washington Carver (c. 1864-1943)

Fake news! “Holy red herring,” as Robin might have said to Batman! The next thing they will be telling us that Santa Claus is fake! Come on! There has been fake news since time immemorial. Think of agencies like the CIA., M15 and the KGB that have always used fake news for purposes of deception. Consider the Apocryphal Press (www.apocryphalpress.com) run by my good friend and former classmate Tom Korson, who uses fake news for the purpose of humor. Think of The New York Times and the Financial Times, both of whom regularly confuse fact with fiction. Much of “real” news is fake.

Hypocrisy is embedded in the sanctimonious Left. Less than two months before the 2004 Presidential elections, Dan Rather went on Sixty Minutes and falsely targeted George W. Bush’s service in the Air National Guard. Later, Brian Williams lied about his helicopter being shot down in Iraq. In 2008, while running for President, Hillary Clinton lied about coming under fire when landing in Kosovo in 1996. She blamed the attack in Benghazi, which killed four Americans including the Ambassador in 2012, on a “hateful” video. In 2009, President Obama told us that under the Affordable Care Act “…we could keep our health-care plan, if we chose.” Or Al Gore’s talking of Polar Bears stranded on melting ice sheets. Or the drumbeat among mainstream media, in the weeks leading to the 2016 election, which assured voters that Donald Trump was too flawed to be elected President. And what about the “recall?” It was born amid great fanfare, but slunk off into the forest to die alone. We were told all of these stories were “real,” but none were. So, what about Santa Claus? With ten grandchildren, I’ll let someone less encumbered respond.

Most media today twist news to accord with a predetermined narrative. News sources on both the Left and the Right succumb to pressure from readers and viewers. But the left’s version is more heinous, as it makes a pretense of having no biases. They cloak their stories in a mantle of sanctimonious rhetoric. The New York Times, a week ago last Sunday, had the chutzpah to editorialize about guiding Americans back to a path of commonly accepted facts: “A President and other politicians who care about the truth could certainly help them along. In the absence of leaders like that, media organizations that report fact without regard for partisanship, and citizens who think for themselves, will need to light the way.” Mr. Sulzberger, it has been you and your staff that have persistently sculpted the news to fit your story lines. It is you and the liberal mainstream media that are so badly in need of a lantern.

Consider two recent articles, one from the FT and the other from the Times: The Financial Times selected Donald Trump as their person of the year. The article, which appeared on December 13th, was spiteful. They compared him to Sinclair Lewis’s fictional fascist “Buzz” Windrip, from his 1935 novel, It Can’t Happen Here. They called him a populist running roughshod over opponents. They implied he could only have been elected by the unwashed and uneducated. They argued his legal use of tax-loss carry-forwards were unethical. They associated him with conspiracists who denied the 9/11 attacks and Sandy Hook school massacres. They then had the temerity to claim to be a “gatekeeper” that will protect gullible readers from exploitation by those who tell tales! Imagine the uproar had tables been turned and media like The Wall Street Journal or The Telegraph similarly excoriated Hillary Clinton!

A New York Times headline last week: “C.I.A. Judgment on Russia Built on Swell of Evidence.” Then the third paragraph: “The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election…Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence – evidence that others feel does not firm judgments – that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired output.” The headline was deceptive; circumstantial evidence represents neither a “swell” nor is it “specific.” And, the FBI has never corroborated the allegation.

The CIA. is critical to American interests, but keep in mind, the art of deception is elemental to their work. They have been known to deceive the press; certainly the Times felt that way when no weapons of mass destruction were discovered in Iraq. Cyber security must be a priority for the next President. Everything, from our water supply to missile deployment to banking transactions are vulnerable. It is a major reason why so many – though not The New York Times – were so concerned over Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private server. It seems likely that, at a minimum, she compromised the e-mail addresses of all those with whom she was in contact, including high-ranking government officials and members of the Democratic National Committee. If anyone is to blame for a foreign government hacking our computer systems, it might well be a former Secretary of State who lives in Chappaqua. The Times has not pursued this line of inquiry, implying motives that are more about assigning blame for the loss by their candidate than uncovering truth.

Of course, the conclusion that the Russians preferred Mr. Trump seems absurd on its face. Mr. Putin was able to do as he wished with President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton – think how strengthened he has become in the past eight years. It was Mrs. Clinton who presented Mr. Putin with a “re-set” button, a button he has re-set to his own advantage. Mr. Trump, on the other hand, represents an unknown, something far riskier to Mr. Putin.

Clinton aides blame loss on everything but themselves,” so read Politico’s headline two days after the election. Democrats are doing what they can to make the loss last month appear the fault of someone other than themselves: for example, bars in the Midwest that were tuned only to Fox News, or Russian leaders who were terrified Mrs. Clinton would be elected. That Democrats nominated one of the most flawed candidates in U.S. history was apparently of no significance. In Trump voters, Democrats see racists, misogynists, xenophobes and “irredeemable deplorables.”  Yet Mr. Trump increased the GOP’s percentage of Hispanic and African-American votes by 2% over 2012. The economy, a stumbling ObamaCare, a collapsing Europe, deteriorating relations in Iraq, and Syria, racial divisions at home, debt, an ethically-challenged candidate – none of these factors played a role, according to those on the Left! Democrats are doing what they claimed Republicans would do when they felt assured of victory. It is humorous, in one sense, discomfiting in another, but mostly it is dangerous, as it threatens our democratic processes.

Elections have consequences, as Mr. Obama reminded us eight years ago. Yes, they do. The people chose, and they selected someone the establishment now recklessly associates with demagogues and fascism. If the Left is serious about removing fake news, a panel should be formed of representatives from MSNBC, Fox News, The Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal, but not Facebook. They could become arbiters. In the meantime, it is time for Democrats to grow up, and to understand the difference between news that is real (Trump won) and news that is fake (Hillary deserved to win).







Labels: , , ,

Thursday, December 1, 2016

"The Month That Was - November 2016"

Sydney M. Williams

The Month That Was – November 2016

                                                                                                                                 December 1, 2016

“November always seemed to me the Norway of the year.”
                                                                                                Emily Dickinson (1830-1886)

Apart from the Cubs winning the World Series, the biggest news of the month was Donald Trump winning the Presidency.

The surprise was not that Republicans won, the surprise was that the Presidential race was as close as it was. A year and a half ago, when the race began to heat up, it was apparent, despite Mr. Obama’s personal popularity, that many of his policies were not working. The economy was sputtering along at the slowest growth rate in the post-War period. Federal debt had doubled to just under $20 trillion, while unfunded liabilities (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc.) had risen from $56 trillion to an estimated $100 trillion in 2016. Debt and entitlement obligations have compounded at 9% over the past eight years. GDP (the nation’s income) has compounded at two percent. When debt expands faster than income, bad things happen. Racial animosities have intensified. Internationally, Russia and China were in ascendancy and the Middle East in shambles. Islamic terrorism showed no signs of abating. Democrats were set on crowning an ethically challenged woman, an individual who epitomized a corrupt Washington establishment and a notoriously poor campaigner to boot. It was expected to be a “Republican year.” Eighteen months later the situation had not improved. What an opportunity for Republicans!

But, in nominating Mr. Trump – the most non-political Presidential nominee ever – Republicans almost blew it. While Trump appealed to vast numbers of working Americans who no longer felt they had access to the American dream, his character was alien to what many people thought proper for a President. But we underestimated the degree of estrangement so many felt toward a government that had practiced identity politics, favored a few special interests and had grown distant from a majority of the American people. Trump’s instincts were more acutely attuned than those of political professionals. He did win, and Republicans held the Senate and the House. Additionally, they control 33 governorships and 32 State Legislatures. While the country remains split, his support was far broader than most Democrats would have one believe. The great irony is that it may take a strong and independent leader to re-energize Congress into resuming its traditional role, as a body that is supposed to check excesses in the Executive, and to work through the ideological posturing that sometimes holds government hostage. Since winning, Mr. Trump’s policy determinants have begun to take shape. The most consequential response – apart from protesters and cries of denial – has been a rise in optimism: Since November 7, the DJIA has risen 4.7%, the U.S. Dollar is up 3.9% and the University of Michigan Consumer Index rose from 87.2 in October to 93.8 in November. It is the prospect of tax and regulatory reform that has the juices flowing.

Thousands on the Left, however, have not yet acknowledged that Mrs. Clinton failed. She had received the financial support of 96% of journalists, according to the Center for Public Integrity, and 99.5% of funds raised by faculty and administrators at the nation’s universities, according to an article in “U.S. News and World Report.” She was the overwhelming choice of the overseas press. Mrs. Clinton raised and spent more than twice as much money as did Donald Trump. Virtually all polls were wrong. In June, when it was obvious that Trump would win the Republican nomination, The Nation published an article headlined: “Relax, Donald Trump Can’t Win?” Yet, Trump garnered more votes than any Republican before and the most Republican electoral votes since 1988, and Mrs. Clinton failed to get as many votes as did Barack Obama in either 2008 or 2012.

One likely consequence of the election is that the 35-year-old bull market in bonds will end. The yield on the Thirty-year Treasury has already risen 12%, from 2.63% on election day to 2.95%. Since 2008, the Federal Reserve, Congress and the President have performed a dance. Fed Funds have been kept near zero for the entire eight years of Barack Obama’s Presidency, something unique in history. Why? Olympians in Washington believe in the omniscience of government, rather than relying on the wisdom of free markets. Blinders prevented them from seeing the results of a policy that has made credit plentiful and cheap for governments, banks, speculators and multinationals, but niggardly and expensive for small and midsize businesses. These policies have hurt savers and the retired. It is true that home mortgage rates are low, and home sales and prices have rebounded over the past few years, but existing home sales are still a million units below where they were ten years ago, and new home sales are only half of what they were in 2006 – despite the country being larger by 20 million people and mortgage rates 30% lower.

Elsewhere domestically, President-elect Trump began the process of building out his advisors and cabinet nominees. He has spoken to early supporters: Senator Jeff Sessions, Donald McGahn, Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliano, Ben Carson, Steve Mnuchin, Wilbur Ross and Congressman Mike Pompeo. And he has reached out to the more traditional base: Mitt Romney, Republican National chair Reince Priebus, Governor Nikki Haley of South Carolina, Georgia Congressman and former orthopedic surgeon Tom Price, former pentagon official K.T. McFarland, Senator Bob Corker, Michigan Republican Committee chair Betsy DeVos and former Labor Secretary Elaine Chao. Similar to protests during the Vietnam era, students protested the election of Donald Trump. Then they were protesting a war they felt undemocratic. Now they protest a democratically-held election. A recount in three states was demanded by Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate. She has raised more money from the liberal faithful for the recount and has received more airtime than she did as a candidate. After years of investigation, two former aides to Governor Chris Christie were found guilty in “Bridgegate.” At Ohio State Abdul Razak Ali Artan, a student from Somalia, deliberately drove his car into a cluster of people, jumped out of the vehicle wielding a butcher’s knife. Eleven were injured, one critically. Within minutes, police responded. Refusing to drop his knife, he was shot and killed. ISIS named him a “soldier of the Islamic State.” A school bus crash in Chattanooga killed six youngsters; something, as a former school bus driver, I found especially horrifying.

Internationally, a poll in the Financial Times suggested that support for the EU had risen since the UK voted to exit the Union. I would be skeptical. The findings do not accord with Angela Merkel’s approval ratings, which are at five-year lows, nor do they reflect what is happening in France, as we head toward next year’s elections. Street fighting has broken out between Muslim refugees and the French police. Marine Le Pen, leader of the National Front, is surging, and free-market reformist Francois Fillon won France’s Republican primary. President Francois Hollande, with an approval rating in the single digits, has not yet decided to seek another term. The FT findings do not fit with events in Austria, which looks ready to elect Europe’s first far-right candidate, Norbert Hofer. In Italy a referendum is scheduled for December 4. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi wants to overhaul their national constitution, giving more power to the executive. If a ‘no’ vote prevails that could lead to Renzi calling an election. A headline in Monday’s Financial Times read: “Troubled Italian banks face fresh risk of failing if Renzi loses vote.” The European Parliament voted to suspend talks between Turkey and the EU over membership. In response, Turkish President Erdogan threatened to re-open Turkey’s gates for migrants and refugees. Russia, in response to NATO’s possible deployment of a “defense shield” in Eastern Europe, threatened to install S-400 surface-to-air missiles and nuclear-capable Iskander missile systems in the enclave of Kaliningrad (between Lithuania and Poland). Truth be told, Europe has problems and the European Union is at risk of collapse.

The New York Times reported last week that 150,000 Venezuelans have thus far fled their homeland, a lesson in what happens when redistributionist policies are carried to extremes. Train derailments killed 115 in India and 45 in Iran. A power station collapsed in China, killing 67. A chartered plane, carrying members of Brazil’s soccer team, crashed in Colombia, killing 76 of the 81 aboard. Mosul was retaken from ISIS by Iraqi forces. The Syrian city of Aleppo remains under siege. Through the middle of the month, Wikipedia lists 123 incidents of Islamic terrorist attacks and executions around the world, with over a 1000 dead. The Taliban are resurgent in Afghanistan. The nuclear deal with Iran had better work, for her position in the region has strengthened, as it has around the globe with the relaxation of sanctions. China’s Defense Minister General Chang Wanquan met with Iran President Hassan Rouhani during the month, Russia is negotiating with Tehran for the sale of arms. Xi Jinping, like his predecessor Mao Zedong, has been named a “core” leader. South Korean President Park Geun-hye is facing impeachment, an event destabilizing the Peninsula. According to Freedom House the number of democracies around the world has declined over the past few years, and this year the United States was assigned a downward arrow. While most of us in the U.S. have much for which to be thankful, there remains a lot of suffering in the world.

Financial markets responded to the election of Donald Trump. Equities surged, as did the Dollar, while bond prices collapsed, as interest rates rose. The Dow Jones was up 5.4% for the month and 4.7% since election day. The US Dollar rose 3.9%, while bond prices declined as yields rose. The way we shop is changing. There were 108 million on-line shoppers this year on “black Friday,” up 5 million from 2015, while the number that shopped in stores fell from 102 million to 99 million. On “cyber Monday” sales from mobile devices rose 33% to $1.2 billion, representing more than a third of total on-line sales.

The Grim Reaper made his appearance: Fidel Castro died at 90 – a murderous tyrant, or a revolutionary icon, as CBS called him? While Cubans mourned, those in the “Little Havana” area of Miami celebrated. Castro was a man who the Associated Press reported “steered their island to greater social equality.” But he did so at the expense of everyone else. In 1958, in terms of GDP per capita, Cuba’s economy ranked 3rd in the region, behind Venezuela and Uruguay. Today they rank either 11th or 12th, and 95th in the world. The AP obviously ignored an article in Forbes that estimated Castro’s net worth at $900 million, while noting that the average Cuban earns $20 a month. If that’s equality, I would like to hear their definition of inequality! At home, we lost two former cabinet officers: Defense Secretary Melvin Laird at 94, and Attorney General Janet Reno at age 78. The Irish novelist and short story writer, William Trevor died in his 89th year. Florence Henderson, better known as Mrs. Brady of the “Brady Bunch,” died at 82. And I lost a good friend in John Perkins who died at 90.

November is a history-filled month. In 1789, George Washington proclaimed the 26th to be a day of “public thanksgiving and prayer.” Seventy-four years later, in 1863, amidst a civil war that would kill 750,000 Americans, Abraham Lincoln issued a proclamation deeming the last Thursday in November a national day of “Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father...” Another 78 years would pass before Franklin Roosevelt officially made Thanksgiving the fourth Thursday of the month. On November 19th, 1863, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address. He stood on the battlefield where one third of the estimated 140,000 troops engaged became casualties four months earlier. It was on November 2, 1917 that UK Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour sent a letter to Baron Walter Rothschild in which he viewed favorably the concept of a national home in Palestine for the Jewish people. On the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month in 1918, the Armistice was signed that ended hostilities between the Allies and Germany. Twenty years later, on the night of November 9-10 in Germany, Nazi mobs burned synagogues, destroyed Jewish shops and vandalized their homes, in a night of terror known as Kristallnacht (the night of broken glass). And. of course, in an event that is forever etched in the memories of those then alive, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

We move on to December, when the gloom of the year’s shortest days is offset by the joy of Christmas.






Labels: , , , , ,