Saturday, March 15, 2025

"Eggs"

 The Ides of March seem a fitting time for this preamble.

 

I am mystified by many of Mr. Trump’s decisions, especially on the subject of tariffs and cryptocurrencies, and I find it disconcerting when I hear him speak disparagingly of some allies as he does. As for Ukraine, Russia and Europe, there may be more than meets the eye. The balance of power among nations constantly shifts. For the forty-five years following the end of the War, the United States and the Soviet Union represented two distinct powers and views of the future. Preservation of democracy and containment of Russia were our policies. Since the end of the Cold War (now 35 years in the past), the U.S. has been the world’s sole super power.

 

While rising national debt is our largest domestic problem, the rise of Communist Chinarepresents our biggest foreign policy threat, with their activities in the Pacific, along with their inroads in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. A world desirous for peace needs a more united, stronger, and productive Europe. The 27 EU member states plus the UK have a population of almost 520 million people and produce a GDP of $17.5 trillion. In contrast, the U.S., with 340 million people, generated $27.8 trillion. In 2023, the EU and UK spent $395 billion on defense, while the U.S. spent $916 billion. The Second World War has been over for 80 years. Europe must spend more on defense. And they must up their productivity.

 

It is not that the U.S. should abandon their European allies; it is that partnership terms shouldbe realistic about the world we live in. The number of nuclear powers has proliferated, and with Iran on the cusp of joining that group, democracies are going to have to band together. Europe needs to address problems inherent to their comfortable and popular welfare states. She needs to play a bigger role in defense of democracy and, perhaps, help sever the alliance between China and Russia. To the extent Mr. Trump’s actions are having that effect – intended or otherwise – that is a positive. In the future, the U.S. must focus more on the Pacific region, as China represents an insidious threat to all freedom loving people.

 

Mr. Trump and his administration need to address this growing concern. His predecessor did not. I only wish I knew what is behind his thinking when it comes to tariffs and cryptocurrencies and why he treats allies as he sometimes does.

 

But on this March 15, I will focus on a more personal, but equally controversial, matter, eggs.

 

Sydney M. Williams

 

More Essays from Essex

“Eggs”

March 15, 2025

 

“…if I’m about to buy an egg, I just buy on price.”

                                                                                                                Ken Anderson, Professor, Department of Poultry Science

                                                                                                                NC State University

                                                                                                                Inverse, online publication Bustle Digital Group

                                                                                                                August 28, 2021

 

Eggs are on our minds. A few days ago Caroline and I watched Claudette Colbert and Fred McMurray in The Egg and I. But it is the price of eggs, due to H5 bird flu, which prompted this essay. A dozen eggs that cost $4.95 a year ago now cost $8.42. According to the Global Center for Health Security, in the fourth quarter of 2024 more than 20 million hens were killed. Since the symptom was first noted in 2022, approximately 148 million chickens have been destroyed. To put that number in perspective, there are a little over 300 million egg-laying chickens in the U.S.  

 

This talk about eggs reminded me of a favorite essay, E.B. White’s “Riposte,” written in response to J.B. Priestly’s op-ed in the December 17, 1971 The New York Times, “The Meaning of Brown Eggs.” Priestly noted that the English prefer brown eggs because they are “closer to nature.” Americans, he argued, prefer white eggs “because their very whiteness suggests hygiene and purity.” But he went beyond eggs to criticize American civilization as being “curiously abstract…You dine off the advertiser’s ‘sizzling’ and not meat of the steak. Sex is discovered in manuals and not in bed.” Priestly’s satirical comments demanded a response, and that eloquent chicken farmer Mr. White did. He wrote that New Englanders prefer brown eggs, as they are plentiful in those parts. But the rest of the country ate white eggs, as they are more common. He added: “I ascribe the whole business to a busy little female – the White Leghorn hen. She is nervous, she is flighty, she is the greatest egg-machine on two legs, and it just happens that she lays a white egg.” Fifty-fours later, the White Leghorn is still the most productive hen in the United States.

 

My parents raised Rhode Island Reds, so we always had brown eggs. As a youngster, I recall taking an egg from a hen’s nest, poking a hole in one end and sucking out the raw yolk. Ugh! My wife’s mother, in New York City where they lived (and did not raise chickens), ate white eggs, but served her husband brown eggs. Why? My wife does not know, but she has fun speculating. Today we buy brown eggs. Why? No good reason, except it is what we have always done. 

 

A year ago, Fabian Carstairs wrote an article for London’s Spectator Live, “Which Came First? The Egg Obviously.” Referencing the Priestly essay, Carstairs noted that “…there’s really no relationship between shell colour and the egg.” He pointed out that eggs from the Chilean Araucana are “a beautiful blue” and that the Chinese Cochin “dapples her eggs with delicate yellow spots.” As for the question of which came first, Mr. Carstairs closes: “In evolutionary biology, chickens are the result of interbreeding between various jungle fowl. A mutation during one of those romances resulted in a fertilized egg whose DNA was distinct from its non-chicken parents. Upon hatching, the first chicken was born.”

 

Now, how to end this scrambled essay? The late radio host Bernard Meltzer once said: “A true friend is someone who thinks that you are a good egg, even though he knows that you are slightly cracked.” Knowing those words apply, I will stop before there is more egg on my face.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, April 24, 2021

"Photos, Children's Books & the Passing of Childhood"

 


Sydney M. Williams

 

Essay from Essex

“Photos, Children’s Book & the Passing of Childhood”

April 24, 2021

 

Some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again.”

                                                                                                                C. S. Lewis (1898-1963)

                                                                                                                The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, 1950

 

A framed photo sits on my desk. Taken two years ago at the Seabright Beach Club in New Jersey, it shows our ten grandchildren, cousin alongside cousin. They range in age from ten to eighteen. Recently, looking for a missing picture, I opened the back and out fell half a dozen photos of earlier Christmas cards. The earliest was for Christmas 2003 when there were five grandchildren. The most recent, 2013 with all ten. Looking at the photos, I choked up, filled with a sense of loss – the passing of their childhood. 

 

As a grandfather, I am having my third go at childhood. But now, as my youngest approaches her thirteenth birthday, that most wonderful of all human experiences is about to fade away. My wife and I were fortunate that our three children produced ten grandchildren within eight years, which meant that their childhoods – from the birth of the first on July 10, 2000 to the youngest turning thirteen, which she will do on June 24th of this year – lasted twenty-one years, or 20% of my life, too short a time for the joy they bring. Being a grandparent means you get the pleasure without the responsibility. Grandparents bring treats, read stories and take them on Thomas the Train. Parents must make them brush their teeth, put them to bed and tell them to turn off their i-Phones. Now, looking at the photo taken in 2003 with my daughter and two daughters-in-law holding their babies, and knowing that today all five are in college, I ask, where has the time gone?

 

One’s own children provide a second shot at childhood. Our first arrived in 1966, and the last (the third) turned thirteen in 1984. Those eighteen years represented 40% of my then life. While my wife and I were the “heavies,” in that we were the ones to discipline our children, we were rewarded with the joys that can only accrue to a parent, in seeing awe in young eyes when first seeing Santa. On Christmas morning 1972, our oldest was six, his sister four, and the youngest not yet two. Around five o’clock that morning the two oldest snuck downstairs, having first made sure that pillows were tucked under the covers of their beds, so that a night-wandering, parent might think they were still asleep. Their mission: to see if Santa had come. Wrapped presents under the tree and filled stockings hung from the mantle gave assurance they had not been forgotten. But the temptation was too great and the time before breakfast too long; so down came the stockings with a crash, which awakened their mother and father. Expressions of wonder and delight on the children’s faces turned rudely-awakened Mother and Father into forgiving Mom and Dad.

 

It is our own childhood to which we return as we grow older. During those dozen years before the teens arrive, time, like desert sands, stretched toward infinity. It was the only life we knew. Grown-ups are, of course, necessary. They provide food and shelter, offer shoulders to cry on and have arms to hug with. But they don’t, as we constantly told them, understand us. My mother would admonish me: “Grow up!” How was I to know what she meant? I was a child and spoke and acted as a child. Now, from a vantage point of almost seventy years, I look back, aided by childhood books and faded black-and-white photographs of people and animals long dead, and I mourn the loss of the innocence of childhood. But I am thankful for memories. I have dozens of pictures with my older sister, younger brother and sometimes baby sister Betsy. Many were taken during the war, most with our mother – on the beach in Madison, Connecticut or playing with goats in Peterborough, New Hampshire. Time has erased hurt feelings, the scare from once being locked in a bath house, recurring nightmares, and the pain of getting my finger caught in a car door. It is the happy times I remember. Riding horseback with my mother, skiing with my father, and doing both with my siblings. 

 

We lived four miles from the village and a mile from the nearest neighbor, so we entertained ourselves. Our house was filled with books, some of which I still own: Miltiades Peterkin Paul by Charles Remington Talbot, writing as John Brownjohn, and An Island Story by Henrietta Elizabeth Marshall. In the introduction she wrote that the book is “not a history lesson but a story-book.” Daddy Jake by Joel Chandler Harris (1889) and Two Little Confederates by Thomas Nelson Page (1889) belonged to my Tennessee-born maternal grandmother. Proud Pumpkin was written and illustrated by Nora Unwin in 1953. She moved to Peterborough from England in 1946, to be close to her friend and collaborator Elizabeth Yates, author of Amos Fortune, Free Man and several other children’s books. When we moved, these books came along. They include The Allies Fairy Book, published after World War I and illustrated by Arthur Rackham. Clement Moore’s The Night Before Christmas, also illustrated by Rackham, was read by my mother and has been read by us to our three children and ten grandchildren. As children, we laughed when my mother read: “He had a broad face and a little round belly, that shook when he laughed like a bowl full of jelly.” Today, upon hearing those words, I smile. 

 

Over the years I purchased others that I knew as a child: Mother Goose, illustrated by Arthur Rackham, Ginger and Pickles by Beatrix Potter, Barnaby by Crockett Johnson, who appeared in comic trips, Crock of Gold by James Stephens and illustrated by Thomas McKenzie. I have original editions of Uncle Remus by Joel Candler Harris, E.B. White’s Charlotte’s Web and Stuart Little, Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain and the four Pooh books by A.A. Milne. My copy of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass were published in 1946 and include the John Tenniel illustrations. I can still recite the poem “Jabberwocky”: “‘Twas brillig, and the slithy toves/Did gyre and gimble in the wabe…” Who does not get nostalgic for their childhood when re-reading the opening sentence in Winnie-The-Pooh: “Here is Edward Bear, coming down stairs now, bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head, behind Christopher Robin.” And who does not weep when Charlotte dies: “It is not often that someone comes along who is a true friend and a good writer. Charlotte was both.” I could go on. There are over three dozen such books on my shelves. I pull one out, glance through it, and the images that appear are of my own childhood, when there was no past, and the future was indistinguishable from the present. 

 

One’s childhood lasts about a dozen years – not long in the average person’s lifetime. But memories emerge as we age. And we realize how quickly those years passed by. Childhood cannot be restored but it can be reclaimed through quiet moments spent alone, sifting through old photographs, and turning the pages of a favorite, childhood story. C.S. Lewis, as quoted in the rubric that heads this essay, was right. I am now old enough to read his magical Narnia tales, which I did three years ago.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

"Nostalgia"

-->
Sydney M. Williams

Essay from Essex
“Nostalgia”
January 1, 2020

It’s a funny thing about coming home. Looks the same,
 smells the same. You realize what has changed is you.”
                                                                                    Eric Roth (1945-)
                                                                                    “The Curious case of Benjamin Button,” 2008
                                                                                    (A screenplay adopted from the eponymous
                                                                                    short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, 1922)

Nostalgia suggests a sentimentality for the past, typically for a period or a place with happy personal associations. The aphorist Mason Cooley once wrote, perhaps more harshly than he had to, “Nostalgia paints a smile on the stony face of the past.” Regardless, our memories do focus on the positive.

Asked by grandson Alex a few months ago to describe what it was like growing up in the late 1940s and early 1950s, I found myself stymied. How does one sift between good memories and bad? What is truth, and what is simply a memory one wants to believe? World events do not define our childhood, nor does the political scene nor even the state of the economy; though all three affect our lives. It is, rather, the relationships with our parents, siblings, friends; it is school, and what chores and play consumed our days. It is the small things, like the instance when I was twelve and found a rare dollar warming my pocket. By chance, the baker who delivered bread and pastries from the back of his van twice a week drove up the driveway. I foolishly bought a dozen jelly donuts and more foolishly proceeded to devour them without sharing. My reward was a stomach-ache and a future aversion to jelly donuts.

Thinking of one’s childhood creates a tendency to look for a past purified through the filter of time. What memories are real, and which exist only in our minds? Unhappy memories become tucked away and are more difficult to recall than those that are pleasant. In Educated, Tara Westover’s 2018 coming-of-age story written when she was thirty-two, the author uses half a dozen footnotes to explain that her memory may be faulty. And she was thinking back only twenty years. In Thomas Wolfe’s novel You Can’t Go Home Again, he explores the changing scene of American society, a universal subject not bound by time or place. Just as in George Webber’s case (Wolfe’s character in the novel), my hometown is different than it was sixty years ago. Oh, yes, the bank and the post office are still on Grove Street and the library is still on the corner of Concord and Main, just across the Contoocook River from the center of town. But the innards are different. The Unitarian Church, where I went as a child, is now the Unitarian Universalist Church, but it sits in the same place, on Main Street and Summer. The elementary school I went to has been gone for over fifty years, but I remember the dark and scary, window-less coat closets and the strict, unsmiling teachers.

The lay-out of the streets is the same, but the movie theater is gone, as are the depot where we used to pick up feed for the animals, and Derby’s, the department store where one could buy anything from clothes to appliances. The biggest store in town today is the Toadstool, a bookstore started by a younger, enterprising brother almost fifty years ago. The physical changes are more cosmetic than foundational. And, yes, Summer Street becomes Middle Hancock Road, as one drives north. Whit’s tow, where I learned to ski, has been replaced by affordable housing units. The Dodge Place, where my parents went to live after they were married in 1938, is still four miles from the village on Middle Hancock Road, about halfway between Peterborough and Hancock. The house and barns still stand, but seemed sad when we recently drove by, in need of paint and too quiet, absent the activity and noise that nine children provided. Seen only in my imagination were the goats and horses that once grazed and played in the fields behind. The pair of peacocks that adorned the front yard have gone to wherever peacocks go when they die.

Two recent events caused a wave of nostalgia to sweep over me and reminded me that I had never answered Alex’s request. The first was a painting in a gallery in Old Lyme. It depicted a summer cabin, such as one might have owned or rented seventy years ago, in the early post-War years, usually on a remote lake or pond. It was a simple structure, in need of repair. One could envision a hand-driven water pump in the kitchen, no electricity and an outhouse out back. An aunt and uncle had such a place on Martha’s Vineyard when I was young, a place I remember with a dozen of us packed into the small uninsulated camp. It had bunk rooms for the children and a half-mooned two-holer thirty feet from the back door. It dawned on me that my grandchildren may never know a life where children entertain themselves in small boats, swim in the lagoon, dig for clams, play hide-and-seek and fly kites. The second event was watching a pick-up game of hockey on Exchange Club Pond in Old Saybrook. As I watched the half dozen skaters pushing a puck around, I thought back to clear, cold winter days when I played similar, informal games of hockey on the Fly Pond in Peterborough, not far from where Summer Street becomes Middle Hancock Road. When we got bored with hockey, we would race up to girls and, in a preteen and early-teen mating ritual, yank off their hats and make them catch us. Once my brother, sister and I watched mournfully as a truck bound for Benson’s Wild Animal Farm carried the carcass of one of our horses that had died a couple of days earlier. Later, as the sun began to set, we would light bonfires and toast marshmallows for S’mores. “It is strange how much you can remember about places like that,” E.B. White wrote in his essay “Once More to the Lake,” “once you allow your mind to return into the grooves which lead back.”

Our childhood lives are long when living through them but pass by quickly in retrospect. In my case, my childhood ended when I was fifteen and went off to boarding school. While I have some memories of when I was three and four, most are between five and fifteen – not a lot of years to form the character we become. But those moments leave an indelible impression. “Sometimes you will never know the value of a moment until it becomes a memory,” wrote Dr. Seuss. I can think of hundreds of such moments – stopping at Howard Johnsons in Brattleboro, after a day of skiing at Hogback or Bromley, with coffee for my father and hot chocolate or a piece of apple pie for us; playing in the hayloft, and once carrying my sister Charlotte back to the house after she fell through the trap door; being summoned from Miss Flagg’s second grade class by a fifth grader who told me he was going to beat me up after school, and being scared stiff the rest of the day (thankfully, he forgot his threat); swinging on birch trees, ala Robert Frost; walking “over the hill” along the mile and half wood road that separated our paternal grandparents’ summer home from ours; spending three days and two nights with my mother in the White Mountains, when I was going through puberty; playing on the swings my father had built in our backyard; posing for our artist parents; picking wild strawberries in the field next to the “Brick House,” now the Well School; climbing on skis the two and a half mile trail from Pinkham Notch to the “Hoard Johnson’s,” a lean-to at the base of Tuckerman’s Ravine on Mt. Washington. My brother Frank and our father were with me. The next day we hiked up Wildcat and skied down. I recall a family trip to Stowe when I was twelve, and the embarrassment of having to share a bed with an aunt. I remember cantering “Judy” along dirt roads, with a younger sibling on “Mitzi,” a smart, stubborn Shetland – the pony on whom we had all learned to ride – who refused to let the much bigger “Judy” pass. And then years later, after I had left home, I heard that my mother had cradled “Mitzi’s” head in her arms as she took her last breath. These memories tear through my conscience like an icy dagger. You can’t go home again, as Thomas Wolfe titled his posthumous novel. You can, but sometimes it is hard.

As children, we lived dual lives. Most of our time was spent in Peterborough, but now and again we would go to East River or Wellesley to visit our grandparents. It was a glimpse into a world different from the one we lived. In Wellesley where my father grew up, our grandparents lived in a large Victorian house, the one in which my grandmother had been born in 1875, and which became hers when she was married in 1907. It is where my father grew up. The house is on Lake Waban (now owned by a cousin), a fancy term for a body of water that we thought of as more of a pond than a lake. My mother’s parents lived in a large house on Long Island Sound in Madison, Connecticut. It had its own beach where we swam and went out in a rowboat. There was a barn and a paddock for the animals my mother would bring with her. Before my grandfather died in 1947, he would take us to “Bruin’s Lair,” a hidden spot, perfect for a friendly bear, in the woods on a path beyond the barn. There we would leave treats which were always gone the next day.

But most of my growing up was in New Hampshire. It may only be the way we remember things, but life seemed simpler in those days. We lived four miles from a village of 2,500 people. There were fewer time-saving devices; an absence of technology meant board games that required shared participation; we memorized poetry and short speeches. I recall one evening memorizing Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address as I walked around the house. At school, we were reminded almost daily of the Ten Commandments, the Lord’s Prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. While patriotism was common and mingled honor with love for country, it was temporarily hijacked by Senator Joseph McCarthy in 1950, when he used it to falsely accuse dozens of loyal Americans of Communist sympathies, solely to advance his dark vision. Personal freedom was a bicycle. Mine came in the form of an “English” bike on my thirteenth birthday, in January 1954. Taking it out, I skidded on the ice, went over the handlebars bruising my jaw. The lesson I learned: Don’t ride a bike on the ice! Nevertheless, our parents worried less as to our whereabouts than do parents today. That didn’t mean they loved us less, just that they felt the environment more secure and they trusted us.

Expectations were less, in terms of what government would provide. It was assumed we would look after ourselves. On the first day of school when in Mrs. Fitzgerald’s fifth grade class, it was expected I would check on my sister Betsy who had just entered Mrs. Morris’ first grade class. Inequality existed. Some kids had parents who lived in bigger houses; some kids were smarter and some stronger and more agile. We didn’t philosophize; we were realists. We knew that some had the ability to hit a ball further and to run faster. Some received better grades and others were more diligent. We got into wrestling fights, especially with bullies. Misogyny, I am sure, existed, but was absent in our household where we children saw our parents as equal partners. That was also true of our grandparents. Our grandmothers, we all knew, were as accomplished as our grandfathers. Our parents and grandparents were lovers of nature and the environment. They made sure we cleaned up after ourselves when picnicking or camping – but we were not told that the Planet would die if we did not switch from wood and coal to oil or gas, let alone solar or wind. In our small town there was some diversity, not in race or religion, but in the ideas and habits of families.

It is important to keep the past in perspective – what we should treasure and what we should leave behind. The British journalist and author of The Rational Optimist, Matt Ridley, wrote recently in The Spectator: “We are living through the greatest improvement in living conditions in history.” Extreme poverty has declined around the world. Despite violence on TV shows, in movies and on video games and the religious tyranny that persists in much of the world, there is less violence today than at any time in history. In rich countries, consumption of minerals and fossil fuels has declined, while standards of living have increased. Reliving the past should not cause us to forget how improved our lives are today. The misty past hides blemishes and the future will have its share. As I wrote earlier, we remember the good and suppress the bad, like getting out of bed in the winter in a house with no central heat; bringing in the kindling, so my father could light the wood stove; having to share a bedroom with three siblings. Clothing material was less friendly: snowsuits became soggy and woolen mittens never kept hands warm. In winter, we had to carry water from the house to the barn for the horses and goats. Picking blackberries on Cobb’s Hill or high-bush blueberries in the “next field “were chores, not outings. Even so, there were moments of fun. I remember once returning from an afternoon of picking blackberries and seeing goats peer out from every downstairs living room window. Someone – it could not have been me – had forgotten to shut the gate to the field and had left the door to the house open.

We forget, also, how improved we are as a country – how civil rights and woman’s rights acts of fifty years ago have bettered the lives of minorities and women; how Medicare and Medicaid have helped the elderly and the poor. Polio was a constant dread for parents and children. The Salk vaccine was first administered in 1955. In 1950, according to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), childhood deaths in 1950 were 29.2 per 1,000.  By 1999, that had dropped to 7.1 per 1,000. Pneumonia and influenza killed 314 children per 100,000 as late as 1960. Forty years later, the number was 8 per 100,000. While nuclear weapons still exist, we no longer – perhaps naively – live with the threat of annihilation from the Soviet Union. Changes in communication have been revolutionary. Today, when on an errand, if I don’t have my cell phone, I feel naked.

We all have a past. It helped formed who we became. It is important for us who are older to communicate our story to succeeding generations; for it helps in their search for identity. But we must keep it within reason; it should not dominate our lives. The last sentence in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby has pertinence. “So, we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.” Fitzgerald refers to an innate desire to recapture the past – that we might correct mistakes we once made. But the truth is the past is the past. It is something to cherish, to learn from, and then move on.

In this season, as the old year goes out and the new year comes in, we sing Robert Burns song, “Auld Lang Syne,” an evocation of the past, “Should old acquaintance be forgot/And never brought to mind?” The answer is no, we should not forget old acquaintances, but it is unhealthy to dwell too much on the past. So, Alex, it is the present and the future over which we have some control. That should be your focus.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!



Labels: , , , , , , , ,